<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>

<rss version="2.0">
 <channel>
  <title>
   Construction Owners &amp; Builders Law Blog
  </title>
  <link>
   http://www.constructionownerslawblog.com/
  </link>
  <description>
   
  </description>
  <language>
   en-us
  </language>
  <copyright>
   Copyright 2010
  </copyright>
  <lastBuildDate>
       Mon, 08 Mar 2010 13:45:55 -0600
   
  </lastBuildDate>
  <pubDate>
   Wed, 10 Mar 2010 08:17:57 -0600
  </pubDate>
  <generator>
   http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34
  </generator>
  <docs>
   http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss
  </docs>
     <item>
    <title>
     Y&apos;all Politics (Alan Lange)
    </title>
    <description>
     
     
    </description>
    <link>
     http://www.constructionownerslawblog.com/links-yall-politics-alan-lange.html
    </link>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">
     http://www.constructionownerslawblog.com/links-yall-politics-alan-lange.html
    </guid>
         <category>
      Links
     </category>
    
    <pubDate>
     Mon, 08 Mar 2010 13:45:55 -0600
    </pubDate>
    <author>
     rcw@williamsonlawfirm.com (Robert Williamson)
    </author>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>
     Mississippi Injury Lawyer Blog (Robert Kisselburgh)
    </title>
    <description>
     
     
    </description>
    <link>
     http://www.constructionownerslawblog.com/links-mississippi-injury-lawyer-blog-robert-kisselburgh.html
    </link>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">
     http://www.constructionownerslawblog.com/links-mississippi-injury-lawyer-blog-robert-kisselburgh.html
    </guid>
         <category>
      Links
     </category>
    
    <pubDate>
     Mon, 08 Mar 2010 13:43:01 -0600
    </pubDate>
    <author>
     rcw@williamsonlawfirm.com (Robert Williamson)
    </author>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>
     Mississippi Family Law Blog (Robert Kisselburgh)
    </title>
    <description>
     
     
    </description>
    <link>
     http://www.constructionownerslawblog.com/links-mississippi-family-law-blog-robert-kisselburgh.html
    </link>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">
     http://www.constructionownerslawblog.com/links-mississippi-family-law-blog-robert-kisselburgh.html
    </guid>
         <category>
      Links
     </category>
    
    <pubDate>
     Mon, 08 Mar 2010 13:41:34 -0600
    </pubDate>
    <author>
     rcw@williamsonlawfirm.com (Robert Williamson)
    </author>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>
     Ipse Blogit (Matt Eichelberger, Jim Craig))
    </title>
    <description>
     
     
    </description>
    <link>
     http://www.constructionownerslawblog.com/links-ipse-blogit-matt-eichelberger-jim-craig.html
    </link>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">
     http://www.constructionownerslawblog.com/links-ipse-blogit-matt-eichelberger-jim-craig.html
    </guid>
         <category>
      Links
     </category>
    
    <pubDate>
     Mon, 08 Mar 2010 13:36:42 -0600
    </pubDate>
    <author>
     rcw@williamsonlawfirm.com (Robert Williamson)
    </author>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>
     The Louisiana Employment Law Blog (Norman Mott)
    </title>
    <description>
     
     
    </description>
    <link>
     http://www.constructionownerslawblog.com/links-the-louisiana-employment-law-blog-norman-mott.html
    </link>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">
     http://www.constructionownerslawblog.com/links-the-louisiana-employment-law-blog-norman-mott.html
    </guid>
         <category>
      Links
     </category>
    
    <pubDate>
     Mon, 08 Mar 2010 13:34:54 -0600
    </pubDate>
    <author>
     rcw@williamsonlawfirm.com (Robert Williamson)
    </author>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>
     NMissCommentor (Tom Freeland)
    </title>
    <description>
     
     
    </description>
    <link>
     http://www.constructionownerslawblog.com/links-nmisscommentor-tom-freeland.html
    </link>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">
     http://www.constructionownerslawblog.com/links-nmisscommentor-tom-freeland.html
    </guid>
         <category>
      Links
     </category>
    
    <pubDate>
     Mon, 08 Mar 2010 13:33:10 -0600
    </pubDate>
    <author>
     rcw@williamsonlawfirm.com (Robert Williamson)
    </author>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>
     MS Litigation Review and Commentary (Phillip Thomas)
    </title>
    <description>
     
     
    </description>
    <link>
     http://www.constructionownerslawblog.com/links-ms-litigation-review-and-commentary-phillip-thomas.html
    </link>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">
     http://www.constructionownerslawblog.com/links-ms-litigation-review-and-commentary-phillip-thomas.html
    </guid>
         <category>
      Links
     </category>
    
    <pubDate>
     Mon, 08 Mar 2010 13:30:28 -0600
    </pubDate>
    <author>
     rcw@williamsonlawfirm.com (Robert Williamson)
    </author>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>
     Foundation Problems - Blame Global Warming or Your Contractor?
    </title>
    <description>
     <![CDATA[<p>&quot;You love your home and then it turns on you,&quot; <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/04/garden/04foundation.html?pagewanted=1&amp;partner=rss&amp;emc=rss"><em>The New York Times</em></a> reports one homeowner said when he discovered the foundation of his home was cracking, crumbling and moving. Repairing unstable foundations costs homeowners around $4 billion a year and that cost often is not covered by insurance.</p>
<p><img alt="" style="width: 237px; height: 356px;" src="http://www.constructionownerslawblog.com/uploads/image/iStock_000001302809XSmall.jpg" /></p>
<p>Frequently, the shifting is the result of contractions and expansions triggered by soil drying out from lack of rain or being flooded by excessive rain.&nbsp; Kate Murphy, writing for <em>The New York Times</em>, reports in &quot;Shifting Soil Threatens Homes&rsquo; Foundations&quot; that some experts believe these shifts are due to global warming.</p>
<p>But weather does not let builders, engineers and architects off the legal hook.&nbsp; They are supposed to consider soil conditions and how that soil might expand and contract during dry and wet weather conditions in designing and building the foundations of homes and other buildings.</p>]]>
     
    </description>
    <link>
     http://www.constructionownerslawblog.com/mississippi-construction-law-foundation-problems-blame-global-warming-or-your-contractor.html
    </link>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">
     http://www.constructionownerslawblog.com/mississippi-construction-law-foundation-problems-blame-global-warming-or-your-contractor.html
    </guid>
         <category>
      Construction Claims
     </category>
         <category>
      Construction Defects &amp; Defective Construction
     </category>
         <category>
      Mississippi Construction Law
     </category>
    
    <pubDate>
     Sun, 07 Mar 2010 10:40:55 -0600
    </pubDate>
    <author>
     rcw@williamsonlawfirm.com (Robert Williamson)
    </author>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>
     New Lead Paint Rules for Renovation of Homes Built Pre-1978
    </title>
    <description>
     <![CDATA[<p>On April 21, new lead paint rules applicable to housing and certain child care schools and facilities built prior to 1978 go into effect.&nbsp;  Lead exposure can cause brain damage; exposure prior to age six is especially dangerous.</p>
<p><img alt="" style="width: 407px; height: 214px;" src="http://www.constructionownerslawblog.com/uploads/image/iStock_000007196528XSmall(1).jpg" /></p>
<p>Contractors and owners can find the EPA's regulations on lead paint in <a href="http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&amp;rgn=div5&amp;view=text&amp;node=40:30.0.1.1.13&amp;idno=40">Title 40, Part 745 of the Code of Federal Regulations.</a></p>
<p>Visit <a href="http://www.illinoisconstructionlawblog.com/2010/03/articles/statutes/lead-paint-law-goes-into-effect-april-22-2010/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+IllinoisConstructionLawBlog+%28Illinois+Construction+Law+Blog%29">The Illinois Construction Law Blog </a>for a great summary of these new rules.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]>
     
    </description>
    <link>
     http://www.constructionownerslawblog.com/construction-defects-defective-construction-new-lead-paint-rules-for-renovation-of-homes-built-pre1978.html
    </link>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">
     http://www.constructionownerslawblog.com/construction-defects-defective-construction-new-lead-paint-rules-for-renovation-of-homes-built-pre1978.html
    </guid>
         <category>
      Construction Defects &amp; Defective Construction
     </category>
         <category>
      Construction Industry News
     </category>
    
    <pubDate>
     Tue, 02 Mar 2010 14:13:54 -0600
    </pubDate>
    <author>
     rcw@williamsonlawfirm.com (Robert Williamson)
    </author>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>
     Amen!
    </title>
    <description>
     <![CDATA[<p>&quot;To listen to talk radio, to watch TV pundits, to read a newspaper's online  message board, is to realize that increasingly, we are a people estranged from  critical thinking, divorced from logic, alienated from even objective truth. We  admit no ideas that do not confirm us, hear no voices that do not echo us, sift  out all information that does not validate what we wish to believe.&nbsp;I submit  that any people thus handicapped sow the seeds of their own decline; they  respond to the world as they wish it were rather to the world as it is.&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>]]>
           <![CDATA[<p>( columnist Leonard Pitts). More on the &quot;Demons of Stupidity&quot; over at&nbsp; <a href="http://thelouisianaemploymentlawblog.blogspot.com/2010/02/demons-of-stupidity-are-winning.html">The Louisiana Employment Law Blo</a>g.</p>]]>
     
    </description>
    <link>
     http://www.constructionownerslawblog.com/public-policy-amen.html
    </link>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">
     http://www.constructionownerslawblog.com/public-policy-amen.html
    </guid>
         <category>
      Public Policy
     </category>
    
    <pubDate>
     Tue, 02 Mar 2010 09:12:22 -0600
    </pubDate>
    <author>
     rcw@williamsonlawfirm.com (Robert Williamson)
    </author>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>
     Snow Damage in DC
    </title>
    <description>
     <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.valanduseconstructionlaw.com/2010/02/articles/tort/huge-snowfall-leads-to-wave-of-roof-collapses/">The Virginia Real Estate and Land Use &amp;&nbsp;Construction Law Blog </a>reports that the recent&nbsp; blizzard in Washington caused a wave of roof collapses. Undoubtedly&nbsp; questions will be raised about the design and construction of some of these structures by owners and their property insurers. .&nbsp;Seeing photos of&nbsp; the damage reminds me again why I love living in Mississippi.&nbsp; It snows for a day then goes away.&nbsp; <br />
&nbsp;</p>]]>
     
    </description>
    <link>
     http://www.constructionownerslawblog.com/construction-defects-defective-construction-snow-damage-in-dc.html
    </link>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">
     http://www.constructionownerslawblog.com/construction-defects-defective-construction-snow-damage-in-dc.html
    </guid>
         <category>
      Construction Defects &amp; Defective Construction
     </category>
    
    <pubDate>
     Sun, 21 Feb 2010 08:00:02 -0600
    </pubDate>
    <author>
     rcw@williamsonlawfirm.com (Robert Williamson)
    </author>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>
     Tax Warning to all Federal Contractors
    </title>
    <description>
     <![CDATA[<p><img hspace="2" border="2" style="width: 200px; height: 135px;" src="http://www.constructionownerslawblog.com/uploads/image/iStock_000002323754XSmall.jpg" alt="" />The <a href="http://federalconstruction.phslegal.com/2010/01/articles/federal-procurement-policy/obamas-message-to-federal-contractors-pay-your-taxes/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+FederalConstructionContractingBlog+%28Federal+Construction+Contracting+Blog%29">Federal Contracting Law Blog</a> reports that&nbsp; in January&nbsp; President Obama signed a <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/memorandum-heads-executive-departments-and-agencies-1">presidential memorandum</a> instructing the IRS to audit all federal contractors.&nbsp; The audit will prevent companies that owe back taxes from obtaining more federal work.</p>]]>
     
    </description>
    <link>
     http://www.constructionownerslawblog.com/construction-industry-news-tax-warning-to-all-federal-contractors.html
    </link>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">
     http://www.constructionownerslawblog.com/construction-industry-news-tax-warning-to-all-federal-contractors.html
    </guid>
         <category>
      Construction Industry News
     </category>
    
    <pubDate>
     Thu, 18 Feb 2010 09:41:30 -0600
    </pubDate>
    <author>
     rcw@williamsonlawfirm.com (Robert Williamson)
    </author>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>
     Defective Pipe Installed by Mississippi Cities and Counties?
    </title>
    <description>
     <![CDATA[<p><img align="middle" alt="" style="width: 245px; height: 163px;" src="http://www.constructionownerslawblog.com/uploads/image/iStock_000006093975XSmall(1).jpg" /></p>
<p>State and local governments across the country may have to replace their water  systems because of defective PVC&nbsp;pipes, according to a whistle-blower lawsuit  filed in California against JM Eagle, one of the worlds largest pipe manufacturers, reports the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/12/business/12pipes.html?partner=rss&amp;emc=rss">New York Times</a>.</p>
<p>The whistle blower claims that the manufacturer fabricated test results. We will be monitoring developments in this case.</p>]]>
     
    </description>
    <link>
     http://www.constructionownerslawblog.com/construction-defects-defective-construction-defective-pipe-installed-by-mississippi-cities-and-counties.html
    </link>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">
     http://www.constructionownerslawblog.com/construction-defects-defective-construction-defective-pipe-installed-by-mississippi-cities-and-counties.html
    </guid>
         <category>
      Construction Defects &amp; Defective Construction
     </category>
    
    <pubDate>
     Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:40:11 -0600
    </pubDate>
    <author>
     rcw@williamsonlawfirm.com (Robert Williamson)
    </author>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>
     Mississippi High Court gets it right (again) in Insurance Coverage Dispute
    </title>
    <description>
     <![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.constructionownerslawblog.com/uploads/image/iStock_000005604144Small.jpg" style="width: 351px; height: 233px;" alt="" />  In a long awaited decision, the Mississippi Supreme Court  ruled last week in<em> <a href="http://www.constructionownerslawblog.com/uploads/file/CO58302-1.pdf">Architex Association, Inc. v. Scottsdale Insurance Company</a></em><a href="http://www.constructionownerslawblog.com/uploads/file/CO58302-1.pdf">  (PDF)</a> that construction defects caused by subcontractor negligence are occurrences(accidents) triggering coverage  under the terms of a general contractors&rsquo;s commercial general liability policy.</p>
<p>The Court&rsquo;s decision is a huge victory for all the major players in residential and commercial construction.  The biggest winners may be homeowners, developers, schools  and state and local agencies.  The cost of remedying a construction defect and the diminished value of a building caused by a construction defect often greatly exceeds the original cost of construction. Absent insurance coverage, homebuilders and general contractors often do not have the wherewithal to indemnify the owner for these legitimate damages.</p>
<p><em><br />
</em></p>]]>
           <![CDATA[<p>Of moment, the Supreme Court rejected the reasoning of a 2003 decision by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals,  <em>ACS Construction Company v. CGU</em>, which held that construction defects caused by a subcontractor's negligence was not an occurrence because the hiring of the subcontractor to do the work was an intentional act not an accident. The Supreme Court concluded that the defective work would be considered accidental if it was the result of  subcontractor negligence rather than intentional misconduct. Whether the defect was the result of an accident or intentional misconduct turns on the subcontractor's conduct not the general contractor's hiring decision.</p>
<p><em>Architex</em> is the second Supreme Court decision in the last six months rejecting the Fifth Circuit&rsquo;s interpretation of Mississippi insurance law. In October , the Supreme Court&nbsp; held in <a href="http://www.constructionownerslawblog.com/uploads/file/CO58302.pdf"><em>Corban v. USAA Insurance Company (PDF)</em></a>, that the anti-concurrent causation clauses in a homeowners&rsquo; insurance policy&nbsp;  inapplicable when wind and water did not act in conjunction&nbsp; in causing Katrina-related damages,rejecting a contrary Fifth Circuit decision.</p>
<p>Architech&rsquo;s lead counsel was <a href="http://www.burr.com/attorneys/DorseyRCarsonJr.aspx">Dorsey R. Carson</a> of Burr and Forman. <a href="http://www.burr.com/attorneys/CheriTGatlin.aspx">Cheri Turnage</a> Gatline of Burr and Forman also participated in oral argument.</p>
<p>Carson and his team bolstered the persuasiveness of their argument  by persuading an incredibly impressive number of organizations to either file friend of the court briefs or to join in Architech&rsquo;s brief. Most of the major contractor associations supported Architex: Associated General Contractors of America; Associated General Contractors of Mississippi; Mississippi Asphalt Pavement Association, Inc.; Associated Builders and Contractors; Mississippi Associated Builders and Contractors, Inc.; American Subcontractors; American Subcontractors Association of Mississippi.  In addition, Architex&rsquo;s position was supported by The Mississippi Insurance Department, the Mississippi Attorney General and the state agencies responsible for state and university construction projects.<br />
&nbsp;</p>
<p>Hat tip to <a href="http://blog.bardwelllaw.com/2010/02/11/i-always-wanted-to-pretend-i-was-an-architex.aspx?ref=rss">Will Bardwell</a>.</p>]]>
     
    </description>
    <link>
     http://www.constructionownerslawblog.com/construction-claims-mississippi-high-court-gets-it-right-again-in-insurance-coverage-dispute.html
    </link>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">
     http://www.constructionownerslawblog.com/construction-claims-mississippi-high-court-gets-it-right-again-in-insurance-coverage-dispute.html
    </guid>
         <category>
      Construction Claims
     </category>
    
    <pubDate>
     Tue, 16 Feb 2010 11:48:49 -0600
    </pubDate>
    <author>
     rcw@williamsonlawfirm.com (Robert Williamson)
    </author>
   </item>
     <item>
    <title>
     Continued Performance Clause Held Unenforceble
    </title>
    <description>
     <![CDATA[The <a href="http://www.realestateandconstructionlawblog.com/construction-claims-contract-clause-requiring-contractor-to-continue-performing-work-during-pendency-of-dispute-between-it-and-owner-and-requiring-it-to-complete-work-before-filing-suit-for-damages-held-unenforceable-due-to-owners-material-breach.html">Real Estate and Construction Blog</a>&nbsp; summarizes a Califonia appellate court recently held a &quot;continued performace clause&quot; is not enforceable when the owner commits a material breach.]]>
           <![CDATA[The <a href="http://www.realestateandconstructionlawblog.com/construction-claims-contract-clause-requiring-contractor-to-continue-performing-work-during-pendency-of-dispute-between-it-and-owner-and-requiring-it-to-complete-work-before-filing-suit-for-damages-held-unenforceable-due-to-owners-material-breach.html">Real Estate and Construction Blog</a>&nbsp; points out that the decision eviscerates the purpose of the clause: &quot;To the extent <em>Barton Properties</em> holds that a continued performance clause is unenforceable when the owner's breach is material, and remains enforceable when a party's breach is minor or immaterial, such clauses would add little or nothing to the parties' legal relationship that is not already part of California law. &quot;]]>
     
    </description>
    <link>
     http://www.constructionownerslawblog.com/construction-contracts-continued-performance-clause-held-unenforceble.html
    </link>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">
     http://www.constructionownerslawblog.com/construction-contracts-continued-performance-clause-held-unenforceble.html
    </guid>
         <category>
      Construction Claims
     </category>
         <category>
      Construction Contracts
     </category>
         <category>
      Construction Law
     </category>
    
    <pubDate>
     Sun, 23 Jul 2006 17:33:56 -0600
    </pubDate>
    <author>
     rcw@williamsonlawfirm.com (Robert Williamson)
    </author>
   </item>
  
 </channel>
</rss>